Tuesday, September 23, 2014

My point of view: A letter to Times of India

To the Times of India,

Dear TOI,

Firstly, I want to congratulate you for the wonderful series in your online edition called OMG. I myself have clicked on these links several times and almost unfailingly. It doesn’t matter what follows OMG or how true it may be because you guys claim to be playing by the rules of the game.Right?  You say online media is crude, crassy and has different rules in comparison to traditional media and that one size does not fit all. Really? And who may I know is responsible for setting these rules of sensationalism. As you are supposedly one of the country’s biggest media houses I’m quite tempted to point all my five fingers at you. In the past, you guys has unashamedly displayed Yana Gupta’s private parts, shamelessly linked Arjun Kapoor to Malaika Arora, put down slide shows of actresses in sex scandals and what not under the title OMG. But enough is enough. Maybe you guys don’t understand (which is not surprising).

Are you guys so click hungry that you make news that is dick hungry? What kind of perverse pleasure do you guys get in sensationalizing stuff like OMG Deepika’s showing her cleavage. So what? Like you mentioned in your futile and rather inane attempt to justify yourselves, Deepika has posed provocatively for many magazines, movies etc etc, but just what gives you the right to make it an OMG moment? Do you understand where I’m coming from. Ok I guess you don’t so let me simplify it like teachers explain to school children.

So here’s me taking central stage with a stick in my hand for class full of children (read TOI journos). I even have a stick in my hand for the mischievous back-benchers. So shall we begin class?

Children, today we will learn about the term OMG and its various usages. OMG is the short form (I would’ve said abbreviation but then these children don’t understand sophisticated words) for Oh My God! It is a term that is used to describe something that really surprises you. It is used to describe something that is unusual and warrants a special mention. It is often used to sensationalize trivial matters to attract viewers and many times uses a red circle to drive home its point. So remember to use OMG whenever you see something surprising like:

a)      OMG teenagers are growing facial hair
b)      OMG the teacher has come to class
c)      OMG my friend had a bath
d)      OMG I wore clothes today
You get the drift right?  Now can some of you tell me some OMG moments in your lives?

One student stands up. ‘yes’ says the teacher. ‘OMG I had breakfast today’ says the student. ‘Well done, child you nailed it’ . So much for OMG moments. Now coming back to Deepika’s cleavage. Why don’t you guys put OMG moments for stuff like ‘OMG, Amitabh Bachchan knows English’ or ‘OMG, Shah Rukh Khan likes to take a plane when he has to travel abroad’.

The crux of the problem is not you guys sensationalizing Deepikas cleavage. The crux is you using it get those extra clicks by calling it an OMG moment when it appears to be a perfectly normal photograph of a woman in a dress. And not to mention that you guys drew a red circle around it just to make it obvious. Are you guys catering to a sperm bank? If you are then it’s a pretty pathetic effort to objectify a woman. If you are doing it, then do a good job of it, will you? We don’t need your stupid sensationalism coz if we want to see a nude woman or a provocative pose there are magazines and media available for that. Are you competing with them for clicks? Maybe you are. And spare us your point of view coz I doubt if anyone is buying it. Why do you have to make a sensation out of Shweta Prasad Basu’s sex racket and then right next to it, run a slide show of other actresses who were involved in sex rackets. Or why should you put up a pic of Yana Gupta showing her private parts and then run another slide show next to it with other actresses that have done something similar???? It’s just down right PATHETIC. Do you guys even care about what you are reporting? I mean this is irresponsible reporting to its core but then I keep forgetting that you guys compete with SUN magazine in terms of crass content.


Not that this one article of mine will make any sense to you and not that it will make any difference but understand this. You guys think you make stars, then get this thru into your heads that WE make YOU. If we choose to boycott you, then you can publish it on your front page. Now that will be a real OMG moment. ‘OMG readers boycott Times Of India’